UPST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equity Bancshares, Inc. has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -64.85%. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78% beat Equity Bancshares, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.88%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $55.38, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Equity Bancshares, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $52.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.27%. Given that Upstart Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Equity Bancshares, Inc., analysts believe Upstart Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Equity Bancshares, Inc..

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equity Bancshares, Inc. has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.835%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Equity Bancshares, Inc. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Equity Bancshares, Inc. pays out 13.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Equity Bancshares, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $277.1M, which are larger than Equity Bancshares, Inc. quarterly revenues of $45.7M. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $31.8M is higher than Equity Bancshares, Inc.'s net income of -$29.7M. Notably, Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.77x while Equity Bancshares, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings, Inc. is 4.98x versus 2.72x for Equity Bancshares, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingClub Corp. has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 11.41%. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78% beat LendingClub Corp.'s return on equity of 7.51%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $55.38, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand LendingClub Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $22.45 which suggests that it could grow by 13.69%. Given that Upstart Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than LendingClub Corp., analysts believe Upstart Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than LendingClub Corp..

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingClub Corp. has a beta of 2.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.663%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingClub Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingClub Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $277.1M, which are smaller than LendingClub Corp. quarterly revenues of $388M. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $31.8M is lower than LendingClub Corp.'s net income of $44.3M. Notably, Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.77x while LendingClub Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings, Inc. is 4.98x versus 1.63x for LendingClub Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneMain Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.48%. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78% beat OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.52%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $55.38, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand OneMain Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.40 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that Upstart Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than OneMain Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Upstart Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than OneMain Holdings, Inc..

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneMain Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.661%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneMain Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings, Inc. pays out 97.23% of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $277.1M, which are smaller than OneMain Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $31.8M is lower than OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $199M. Notably, Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.77x while OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings, Inc. is 4.98x versus 1.35x for OneMain Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM Corp. has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.25%. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.78% beat SLM Corp.'s return on equity of 27.31%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $55.38, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand SLM Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $31.82 which suggests that it could grow by 15.03%. Given that SLM Corp. has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, Inc., analysts believe SLM Corp. is more attractive than Upstart Holdings, Inc..

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM Corp. has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.996%.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Upstart Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM Corp. pays out 17.15% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $277.1M, which are smaller than SLM Corp. quarterly revenues of $836.1M. Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $31.8M is lower than SLM Corp.'s net income of $135.9M. Notably, Upstart Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.77x while SLM Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings, Inc. is 4.98x versus 1.91x for SLM Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.